ONE of Scotland’s newest railway stations has been branded a flop after attracting less than half of the estimated users in its first year.
Taxpayer-funded Edinburgh Gateway opened in December 2016 at a cost of £41 million – almost double its original budget.
But despite official estimates it would see 500,000 to 600,000 passengers pass through it every year, new figures show just 230,090 visited the station in the 11 months to November.
READ MORE: Government study on future of ferries to Outer Hebrides
Scottish Liberal Democrat transport spokesman Mike Rumbles MSP said the Government’s business case for the station “has come completely off the rails”.
He said: “These figures show that Edinburgh Gateway is sitting lonely and underused.
“Liberal Democrats warned that it would have been better to build a proper airport station, instead we now have a vastly over-budget station with poor connections.”
Edinburgh Gateway was initially planned to connect to the Edinburgh to Glasgow line, but the proposals were later dropped – a decision many now blame on its poor performance.
It lies next to the depot for Edinburgh’s controversial tram system, and offers services to Fife, Perth, Dundee and Inverness, as well as a tram connection to nearby Edinburgh Airport.
READ MORE: Government study on future of ferries to Outer Hebrides
Figures for the last 11 months, released under Freedom of Information laws, show around 4,790 passengers pass through the station every week on average.
The shortfall in users amounts to around £1.3 million in lost ticket sales, if calculated using average fare revenues from the Office of Rail and Road.
As well as taxpayers picking up the bill for the station’s construction, they also pay for its staff due to the interchange being excluded from the ScotRail franchise agreement with Abellio.
Transport Scotland declined to say how many employees work at the station, but confirmed it was manned between 5.50am and 11.30pm every day.
Staff also cover automatic ticket gates during the morning and evening rush hours, as well as at peak times on Saturdays.
Scottish Conservative transport spokesman Jamie Greene called on the Government to take full responsibility for its “wildly wrong” projections.
He said: “The SNP Government planned this project and spent a significant amount of taxpayers’ money on it.
“It must take full responsibility for these failings, and explain why these projections were so wildly wrong.
“What’s more, the money spent on this initiative was far in excess of what was initially pledged.
“Commuters are fed up of a rail service which is too often over-priced and unreliable. Mistakes like this only exacerbate the situation.”
READ MORE: Government study on future of ferries to Outer Hebrides
But Paul Tetlaw of Transform Scotland – which campaigns for sustainable transport – said upcoming development in the surrounding area offered a “significant potential for passengers”.
He added: “Opposition politicians would be better focusing their attention on the Government’s massive road building programme, rather than one single station.”
Transport chiefs admitted the station had failed to attract the number of passengers originally expected.
A Transport Scotland spokesman said: “Ministers are committed to increasing rail as a regular travel choice and we work with ScotRail to encourage passenger growth.
“While these figures are lower than initial estimates for Edinburgh Gateway Station, future growth is expected as housing and business developments take shape in the local area.”
READ MORE: Government study on future of ferries to Outer Hebrides
Upcoming developments in the area include 1,500 homes immediately to the north of the station, as well as the nearby International Business Gateway scheme, which describes itself as a “new city quarter for Edinburgh”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel