BUSINESS leaders have claimed UK could lose up to £31 billion in trade by 2030 because of the failure to increase flights to China, Brazil, Russia, India.
The CBI said the study shows the "stark" need to build a new runway at Heathrow, as recommended last week by the Airports Commission.
If there are delays to new runway capacity beyond 2030, the annual cost to the UK economy in lost trade with the so-called "BRIC" countries could be up to an additional £5.3 billion, which will rise each subsequent year, the business group warned.
Welcoming the Prime Minister's pledge to make a decision on the Airports Commission's recommendations before the end of the year, the CBI said it wants to see diggers on the ground by 2020.
Katja Hall, the CBI's deputy director general, will tell a Runways UK conference in London: "Delaying the decision to build a new runway will have a very real economic cost for our country.
"The Commission has been clear in its recommendation to the Government, and so are we - get on with building it without delay.
"A new runway will help rebalance our economy, prevent us handing opportunity to our rivals and avoid a future bill for our inaction.
"When it comes to airport capacity, time is money. We're not just missing out on global opportunities, but paying an economic price right here in the UK.
"Our failure to increase flights to BRIC countries alone will cost the UK as much as £31 billion in lost trade in the period it takes to build a new runway.
"That's just from a lack of flights to the BRIC countries - just the tip of the iceberg.
"We welcome the Prime Minister's guarantee that he will deliver a decision this side of Christmas. He is right too - delaying into 2016 is too late.
"We need to get the legal process under way before the end of the year, and Parliament needs to get behind it. If it does that, we could see spades in the ground by 2020, with a new runway online between 2025 and 2030, and the whole country reaping the benefits by 2040."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article