Privatising Network Rail could result in annual fare rises of 15% or an increased cost to the taxpayer of £1.4 billion a year, a rail union has warned.
The Rail, Maritime and Transport union said the figures were calculated on the basis of profits private investors would take and the additional costs that would be accrued by the outsourcing of rail maintenance.
NR's predecessor Railtrack had a profit margin of 8% and today's investors will want the same, according to the union.
The warning was made ahead of a report on the future of NR by Nicola Shaw, expected to be published in the coming days, with speculation that she will recommend part privatisation.
RMT general secretary Mick Cash said: "It has been widely trailed that the Shaw Report, expected to be published this week, is likely to give the green light to the further break-up and privatisation of the publicly-owned Network Rail.
"Our research shows that not only would such a move hammer down on safety it would also hit passengers in the pocket with massive increases in fares to pump up the private sector profit margins.
"In the week when the country is braced for even more austerity from (George) Osborne's Budget, passengers who already pay the most expensive fares in Europe will be appalled when they find out that the real burden of delivering returns to the private sector will fall directly to them.
"RMT will fight any attempt to bust apart the Network Rail operation and sell it off piecemeal in a return to the corporate greed and lethal days of Railtrack."
A Department for Transport spokesman said: "Safety and value for money for passengers and taxpayers will continue to drive our approach to the railways.
"Rail fares are supporting the biggest modernisation to the railways in over a century but we do not want hardworking people to pay more than necessary.
"That is why we have capped regulated fares for the past three years and up to 2020.
"The Shaw report is independent and we will consider its recommendations carefully once it is published."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel