ELGIN’S controversial western link road has been dropped from Moray Council’s capital spending plan, along with the accompanying new rail crossing.
Councillors voted 13-11 in favour of pulling the project to save the authority £8.5m. It followed a warning from officials to members that they could not afford to complete all building projects on the council's wish list.
The plan for the new route, which divided local opinion, was to connect New Elgin with the A96 Aberdeen to Inverness road, creating a new crossing over the railway line and opening up land for housing development.
As it is a reduction in government grant and increased costs for providing services, has created a £6m hole in next year’s council revenue budget and a recurring shortfall that is projected to lead to £14 in the following year.
Conservative councillor Douglas Ross moved the motion, seconded by SNP group leader Gary Coull, to drop the multi-million pound project, which was still supported by most of the ruling Independent/Tory administration.
At the meeting councillors were formally notified that their financial position was contrary to their statutory role to maintain a sustainable budget, and this would need to be addressed during the next two years.
The £8.5m project was due to come before the planning and regulatory service committee later this year.
The new crossing was designed to cope with the projected growth in traffic numbers over the next ten years.
Council leader Stewart Cree, who voted to keep the project in the plan, said it would be a grave error to abandon the project that had been approved as a council priority.
He was supported by fellow Independent councillor John Cowe, who said the existing crossing over the Inverness-Aberdeen railway was already at 103 per cent capacity, and that the new crossing would have had major benefits.
“The road would have generated an estimated £6m in council tax revenues, and a potential boost to the local economy of £100m,” he said.
He added that a new crossing would have to built at some stage, it would now simply cost more.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here