FLIGHTS from Scotland to London are nearly always cheaper than travelling by train, a survey by The Herald has found.
The survey, which compared return journeys on six consecutive weekends from April to June, found some journeys were almost 60% cheaper by plane.
It also revealed that on all occasions passengers could make the journey more cheaply on the budget airline easyJet than they could by rail, even including additional charges for checked baggage. On three out of the six weekends it was up to 16% cheaper to fly British Airways than travel by train, even though the airline price included checked luggage, and complimentary food and drink.
Colin Howden, director of Transform Scotland, a charity which campaigns for sustainable transport, said it was often possible to reduce the price of train travel if you knew how to split the journey into several cheaper singles, but it was unfair to expect an average commuter to do so.
He added: "With Edinburgh and Glasgow being two of the busiest air routes from Heathrow, some of the expansion being demanded at south-east England airports would not be required if a significant proportion of Scotland-London air travel switched to rail.
"However, the high levels of dependence on air travel will remain so long as the aviation industry continues to benefit from the exemptions it enjoys from fuel taxation or VAT."
The survey compared prices to find the cheapest combination of return tickets for each journey, setting off from either Edinburgh or Glasgow, on condition it included only direct routes and luggage allowance both ways. Departures were after 6am and arrivals before 11pm, and referred to standard adult fares.
On one weekend it was possible to get a flight with easyJet from Glasgow to Gatwick, with return flight from Stansted, from £68.98 – 57% cheaper than the lowest train fare from Glasgow Central to London Euston, which came in at £108. That same weekend it was possible to fly BA from Glasgow to Heathrow, returning from Gatwick, for £93 – 16% cheaper than the train.
Only on one weekend out of six was it cheaper to travel to London by train from Glasgow, while easyJet was the cheapest option for all six weekends leaving from Edinburgh.
It comes as the launch of Virgin's Little Red service – running a total of nine flights a day from Edinburgh and Aberdeen to Heathrow – promises to drive prices down further as it competes with BA, which until now has had a monopoly on the London-Heathrow route.
Douglas McNeill, an aviation analyst, said: "The inevitable impact of greater competition is lower prices."
Airlines claim their margins are already squeezed by air passenger duty (APD), a fee levied on each passenger taking off from the UK.
However, Richard Dixon, director of Friends of the Earth Scot- land, said: "The carbon emissions from the plane journey are a minimum of three times those from the train journey, yet the prices often encourage people to fly instead of travelling by rail, because airlines pay virtually no tax."
Simon Buck, chief executive of the British Air Transport Association (BATA), said air travel in the UK was among the most expensive in the world. He added: "Many people who live in Scotland like the convenience of flying to London and sadly we have seen many of those routes disappearing, partly due to capacity restrictions on London runways. Increasing charges would only hit the least well-off."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article