AUDITORS have been asked to look at a troubled Clyde ferry service which has been restricted to carrying only 12 passengers after it emerged the crew were not adequately trained.
Audit Scotland confirmed it had asked accountancy firm KPMG to look into the Kilcreggan Ferry service between the Rosneath peninsula and Inverclyde, to see whether a full investigation would be warranted.
The restrictions were imposed this week by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency after it discovered the boat's skipper, who has been working for operator Clydelink since April, did not have one of the certificates required to carry more than 12 passengers.
In a letter to The Herald today, George Freeman, leader of the group of independent councillors at Argyll and Bute Council, said Strathclyde Partnership for Transport, which subsidises the service, had not given an "acceptable answer" to their inquiries.
He wrote: "As stated in the minutes of the SPT Operations Committee dated January 20, 2012, this contract was awarded by SPT to Clydelink, 'based on the provision of a new build 60-seat vessel'.
"Given this decision, the question must be asked why we have a 16-year-old vessel on the route currently restricted to 12 passengers?
"Unfortunately SPT fail to give an acceptable answer to this and many other questions that have been raised with them on this matter."
A spokesman for Audit Scotland confirmed KPMG, external auditor for SPT, had been asked to establish whether there were grounds for a full investigation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article