THE cost of building a 28-mile bypass around Aberdeen has nearly doubled to £652 million following years of delay caused by local objections, the Scottish Government has confirmed.
In a statement to the Scottish Parliament, Transport Minister Keith Brown said building the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (AWPR) together with the Balmedie to Tipperty project would cost £900m, including VAT.
The last valuation for the AWPR, in 2008, put the scheme at £347m but costs have since gone up due to inflation and "scope changes", Mr Brown said, pointing to "unwanted delays" caused by a public local inquiry and a subsequent legal objection.
But he was accused of using an "absurd under-estimate" of the project's true cost by Green Party MSP Patrick Harvie, who pointed out construction cost estimates had not been updated in four years.
The Scottish Government saw off a legal challenge to the bypass earlier this month, paving the way for construction of both schemes to get under way in 2014, with a likely completion date of 2018.
Both Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire councils, which are due to fund 19% of the main AWPR project – which does not include a "fastlink" section linking the motorway to Stonehaven –confirmed yesterday they would find the extra money to allow the scheme to go ahead.
In his statement, Mr Brown said inflation had accounted for £230m of the cost increases. He said: "The AWPR is vital for jobs, the economy and improving the transport infrastructure of Aberdeen and the north-east.
"Over the next three decades, the project is expected to bring in an additional £6 billion to the north-east economy and create around 14,000 new jobs.
"The unwanted delays caused by the protracted public local inquiry and legal challenges have resulted in a substantial increase in the overall cost of the project."
As The Herald reported last year, officials in Government agency Transport Scotland warned the then Transport Minister, Stewart Stevenson, in June 2008 that the cost of the AWPR was likely to increase beyond previous estimates which dated back to 2005, when a budget of between £295m and £395m was set.
A memo to ministers the following February recommended carrying out a review of costs but this was not acted upon at the time.
Mr Harvie accused ministers of producing "nonsensical figures". He said: "We've been saying for years that costs the Scottish Government based its decision on were an absurd under-estimate. Even for those who are fans of the SNP's everlasting road-building programme, it's impossible to form a sensible view of the cost/benefit ratio for a project like this on the basis of such nonsensical figures."
However, Aberdeen City Council leader Barney Crockett said: "We realised the cost of the AWPR would be roughly what it now is and we have made adequate provision for that. The economic performance of the area will be underpinned by the AWPR."
Five judges at the Supreme Court unanimously rejected a final appeal by campaign group RoadSense earlier this month.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article