URGENT repairs to the Forth Road Bridge have been planned for later this year after engineers concluded that nearly 1000 heavy duty bolt assemblages would need to be replaced, at a cost of £5 million.
Engineers embarked on emergency repairs earlier this year after 17 cracked nuts were discovered on the bands that secure the vertical steel ropes to the two main suspension cables, causing significant delays to motorists.
But they have now concluded that all 944 bolt assemblages will have to be replaced to avoid further corrosion and the consequent disruption caused by emergency repair work.
The Forth Estuary Transport Authority (Feta), which operates the crossing, said yesterday it was planning to sidestep European procurement rules in order to start work before winter, when such work would be especially disruptive.
Barry Colford, chief engineer and bridgemaster, stressed that the bridge was not unsafe but said motorists could face more delays later this year if further cracks appeared.
"Until we have replaced all of these bolt assemblies, it is quite possible that further emergency repairs will have to be carried out at short notice," he said.
"So far we have been able to limit the disruption, but this would become increasingly difficult if failures occur during the winter when light and fair weather are in shorter supply."
Feta, which has seen its capital funding cut by 56% over three years, is expected to raise £850,000 of the funds, with the remaining £4.15m provided by the Scottish Government. It admitted this may cause other work to be deferred.
Problems with the cable band bolt assemblies were first discovered in 2007 and a long-term programme to replace all the nuts was put in place, which was due to cost £530,000. However, engineers have now concluded that they will have to be redesigned.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article