GRIDLOCK in urban areas is costing car-commuting households £4.4 billion a year, according to a report.
Congestion in London accounts for £2bn of the overall annual cost, the report by traffic information company Inrix and the Centre for Economics and Business Research showed.
The report was compiled by studying congestion in the UK's 18 largest urban areas. It was found that the average British driver spent 40 hours a year stuck in jams, with the average for London drivers 80 hours.
The overall cost was made up from the direct cost of fuel wasted (£441 million), commuter time wasted in traffic (£2.79bn) and the indirect cost to household bills (£1.19bn).
The bills figure was compiled from higher freight and business fees as a result of company vehicles being stuck in traffic, with the additional costs being passed on to households.
As well as London, the urban areas in the study included Glasgow, Edinburgh, Belfast, Birmingham, Bradford-Leeds, Bristol, Cardiff and Coventry.
Inrix European director Matt Simmons said: "These findings expose the significant economic impact gridlock is having on the UK economy.
"Congestion is reducing productivity, leaving commuters with higher bills and less time, as well as damaging the environment.
"By making sense of traffic intelligence on vehicle movement, bottlenecks and congestion, Britain can address the challenges facing its road network."
The other areas in the study included Kingston-upon-Hull, Leicester, Liverpool and Manchester.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article