PUBLIC acceptance of speed cameras has increased significantly over the last five years amid growing support for their role in increasing road safety, a survey has found.
Research by the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) found 85% of the public believed speed cameras had contributed to a drop in fatal road accidents since the 1990s, with Scotland having the highest enthusiasm for the devices.
The proportion of people describing safety cameras as unacceptable fell from 30% in 2007 to 16% this year, IAM's annual poll found.
Public acceptance in Scotland was far higher, with 82% of people saying they were either very or quite acceptable, compared to a UK average of 77%.
However, the same survey found nearly half – 45% – of UK-wide respondents thought their main purpose was to raise money.
IAM chief executive Simon Best said: "Speed cameras are an essential part of the policing toolkit and are becoming more and more accepted, but it's clear that some people need reassuring about their purpose and funding."
Scottish Government figures out last month showed there were two-thirds fewer deaths and serious injuries on Scotland's roads where safety cameras are installed.
The debate about their use is complicated by what is known as "regression to the mean" – a term used to describe the fall in fatal road accidents that would be expected to occur at an accident blackspot regardless of whether safety cameras are installed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article