A new third runway at Heathrow is backed by Inverness Chamber of Commerce, but only if the Highland capital is guaranteed flights to and from the airport.
The Airports Commission is assessing both Gatwick and Heathrow airports' bids for additional runway capacity, both of which are controversial.
Chaired by Sir Howard Davies, The Commission was set up by the UK government in November 2012 to examine the capacity required to maintain the UK's position as Europe's most important aviation hub.
In its interim report in December, it identified a need for one additional runway in London and the south east. Proposals from Gatwick and Heathrow were put out for public consultation, which ends tomorrow.
In its submission, Inverness Chamber backs Heathrow's North West Runway proposal because the ambition to connect all parts of the UK as an international hub airport.
Its support, however, is given with the clear condition that Inverness Airport is guaranteed services operated by principal airlines to and from Heathrow, and that these should be given financial backing if necessary.
This requirement has been made in response to several recent blows, including the early mothballing of Flybe's London City/Inverness route which launched just over three months ago.
Stewart Nicol, Chief Executive said "Throughout the consultation process we have been struck by the scale and ambition of Heathrow's proposal, which has the economic prosperity of the UK at its heart. In addition to setting out a compelling economic case, the airport has engaged with local and national stakeholders to listen to the ambitions they have for the project and address any concerns.
"We also believe that Heathrow's proposal recognises the economic importance and potential of all regions of the UK. Highland businesses are increasingly operating competitively in the global market place, and in spite of our unfit for purpose infrastructure, the region has enjoyed consistent economic growth. Nevertheless, this cannot be sustained for much longer without improved connectivity. "
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article