NEARLY 18 miles of the notorious A9 are to be dualled a year earlier than originally scheduled.
The decision to bring forward the work follows a move to divide stretches of the route between Perth and Inverness earmarked for improvement.
Contractors will now be able to proceed earlier on sections where preparations for the upgrade can be done more quickly than the rest of the route.
The first stretches to undergo improvements, a year earlier than planned, will be the 6.5 miles between Pitagowan to Glen Garry, the 5.2miles from Dalwhinnie to Crubenmore, and 5.7 miles from Tomatin to Moy.
Draft proposals have also been published for one of the busiest sections of the A9 near six-mile stretch between Luncarty to the Pass of Birnam near Dunkeld, Perthshire. Work on the 4.5-mile stretch between Kincraig and Dalraddy is already due to start in 2015/16 and be completed in 2017.
A new landscape policy has also been announced for the project to protect the environment.
Transport minister Keith Brown said: "We have pledged to bring forward elements of the scheme wherever we can and we are delivering on that.
"As a result of the detailed survey work that has been going on along A9 between Perth and Inverness, we are providing further details which will see the programme divided into 12 distinct schemes from the original nine, allowing three new sections of the route, totalling 17.46 miles of upgraded road, to be accelerated through the complex design and legal process.
He said there was 82 miles to be dualled between Perth and Inverness and these schemes helped to meet the Scottish Government's pledge to complete more than half of the entire upgrading by 2022 and it all by 2025.
Nick Halfhide, head of operations at Scottish Natural Heritage, said of the new proposals for the road: "The A9 passes through many sensitive areas for wildlife and their habitats, which will clearly need to be taken into account in the dualling project."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article