Limiting the number of passengers novice drivers can carry is the most popular measure among the public for improving young motorists' safety, according to a survey.
As many as 58% of those questioned felt a passenger limit should be introduced for drivers aged 17-21, the poll by Direct Line found.
More than half of the 2,003 adults surveyed thought young drivers should display a symbol, such as the voluntary P for probationary, for a period after passing their driving test.
And 53% also reckoned that 17 to 21-year-olds should only be allowed to drive on a motorway when they have become more experienced.
Nearly half (47%) said lessons on motorways should be compulsory before taking the test, while the same number felt curfews should be imposed on young motorists to deter late-night driving.
Other measures that received some support in the survey included stricter penalties for drivers committing an offence when under a certain age, lower speed limits for young drivers and a retest for young drivers every year until they reach a certain age.
In addition, the poll found 30% reckoned the driving test should be made harder, with only 11% believing it should be easier. When it came to safety devices, 43% believed it should be compulsory for drivers aged 17-21 to have telematics devices installed in their car.
Paul Felton, head of telematics at Direct Line, said: "The safety of young drivers is a key focus for all of us involved in motoring and we should be doing everything we can to reduce the disproportionate number of accidents this group has."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article