THERE has been a big rise in the number of sex offences reported on the railways, with high-profile celebrity prosecutions for sex attacks being one of the reasons given for the increase.
There were 1,117 sexual offences recorded by British Transport Police (BTP) in the 12 months ending March 2014, a near-21 per cent increase on the 925 in the previous year.
Most of the increase was in sexual crime against girls and women, which which went up by 139 to 624. Indecent exposure cases rose from 141 to 148.
A BTP spokesman said the rise in sexual offences was slightly higher than seen by other UK police forces.
He added: "Part of this increase can be attributed to the high-profile prosecutions of celebrities for historical offences which have, undoubtedly, given victims more confidence to come forward."
Covering Scotland, England and Wales, the BTP figures showed that overall for 2013/14, notifiable crime - the more serious offences - dealt with by BTP, fell by 5.7 per cent from 53,885 to 50,840.
BTP Chief Constable Paul Crowther said the force's Project Guardian had had a significant impact on sexual offences .
Project Guardian is meant to increase awareness and confidence among the public to report unwanted sexual behaviour to police .
Motor vehicle and cycle crime as well as public disorder offences dealt with by BTP rose slightly, but there were drops of around of 17 per cent in thefts of passenger property and robberies, with thefts of railway property falling nearly nine per cent to 4,406.
BTP attributed the dip in thefts to its Operation Magnum campaign advising passengers on tactics used by thieves.
The force also pointed to its efforts in tackling metal and cable theft from the railways.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article