FORMER Scotland rugby player Scott Hastings and his wife are campaigning for a change in the law to protect cyclists after they lost two close friends in road accidents in a fortnight.
The retired Grand Slam winning star and his wife Jenny became involved in an online petition after the death of Edinburgh investment manager Andrew McMenigall, 47, who was knocked off his bicycle by a lorry.
He died along with colleague Toby Wallace on the first day of a 960-mile fundraising cycle from Land's End to John O'Groats on July 1.
Then another friend, Douglas Brown, 79, of Leith, Edinburgh, suffered serious injuries and died three days later in hospital when he was hit by a truck while cycling on the B9080 Linlithgow to Kirkliston road, near Winchburgh Bing, West Lothian, on July 11.
Both men knew the couple through the Edinburgh Triathletes Club, where Mr McMenigall coached.
Mr Brown, a founding member of the club, had also trained Mrs Hastings for a number of years.
The experience has encouraged the Edinburgh couple, who are keen amateur riders, to lend their names to Cycle Law Scotland's (CLS) petition calling for a stricter liability law to protect Scotland's vulnerable road users by making motorists automatically at fault in collisions with cyclists.
The online campaign currently boasts almost 3500 signatures, with the group having set a target of gathering 5000.
The ex-rugby star said: "For Jenny and I, this is all about awareness. All road users need to be far more aware of cyclists who use the road. This can be as simple as giving more space to a cyclist when passing or overtaking but we also believe that cyclists also have a responsibility to be more visible to other road users.
"Cycle Law Scotland's (CLS) campaign will help to make our roads safer for all cyclists and we would urge as many people as possible to support this worthwhile cause."
CLS was set up by Brenda Mitchell, a keen cyclist and a personal injury lawyer.
The group is hoping to introduce a member's bill to the Scottish Parliament this autumn with the hope of changing the law.
Stricter liability laws would mean that in the event that a larger, faster moving vehicle is in collision with a cyclist or pedestrian, the driver should be presumed liable but if the injured party is under 14, over 70 or disabled, then the driver should be deemed fully liable.
The law is already widely enforced on continental Europe. Apart from the UK, only Cyprus, Malta, Romania and Ireland do not operate a system of strict liability for road users.
However, opponents of the proposals have argued that all road users should share an equal responsibility for safety.
Alan Douglas, a member of the Institute for Advanced Motoring, previously said: "This assumption that it is always the motorist at fault is absolutely breathtaking."
Ms Mitchell said: "I am delighted to welcome Scott and Jenny's support for the Road Share campaign. Road safety measures affect us all and I am pleased they are both able to recognise the benefits a strict liability regime could introduce.
"Our European neighbours are proving that the regime, which imposes responsibilities on those in control of dangerous objects to others, leads to increased awareness and greater consideration for vulnerable road users, therefore potentially reducing the number of tragic incidents.
"Losing someone you love in a road traffic collision is a tragedy I wouldn't wish upon anyone. With already nine cyclists killed in Scotland this year, now is the time for action, we must join our European counterparts."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article