TRAIN operator First ScotRail is due to be paid more than £2 million in compensation for train delays encountered during two successive winters when record freezing temperatures and heavy snowfall caused severe disruption to Scotland's rail network.
The firm was paid £1m for the four-week period covering January 2010 by Network Rail, which owns and operates track and signals, according to figures obtained by The Herald.
Compensation payments for the following winter, when another bout of record sub-zero temperatures led to widespread train cancellations over a six-week period, are yet to be finalised but are expected to be even higher due to an increase in delays blamed on Network Rail.
ScotRail insisted it had not profited as the compensation was outweighed by the loss of income because of passengers not travelling or being compensated for services that did not operate.
However, the payments, part of a system set up when ownership of Britain's railways and trains was separated during the 1990s to hold private companies accountable for delays they cause, have attracted criticism from passenger groups and politicians.
The figures, which were disclosed by Government agency Transport Scotland, reveal £2.8m was paid by Network Rail to ScotRail between October 2004, when First Group won the franchise, and March 2010, while £2m was paid by the train operator to Network Rail.
Anthony Smith, chief executive of rail watchdog Passenger Focus, said: "Passengers benefit when train companies keep Network Rail on their toes. However, the sight of different parts of the rail industry wrangling over compensation is not edifying, especially when so little of the money reaches the people who have really suffered – passengers. Train companies can be kept sharp and acutely aware of problems when passengers speak up."
Aileen McLeod, the SNP MSP who sits on the Scottish Parliament's Infrastructure Committee, said the arrangements were "clearly inefficient".
She said: "This seems like a waste of money if both companies are simply passing money between each other every time there is a fault. Clearly, Network Rail are causing more of the hold-ups on the system, but when money simply moves from one company to the other and back again there is little incentive to improve."
Network Rail, under pressure to reduce the cost of running Britain's railways, conceded compensation payments for delays – known as Schedule 8 payments – "can't be the right way forward" if they put it into conflict with train operators.
A spokesman for the company said: "The performance regime (Schedule 8) is a useful management tool that helps us to understand the root cause of delays and thereby improve train performance.
"However, contractual relationships that look to put us into conflict with our customers – where the purpose is to allocate blame – can't be the right way forward when we're trying to work more closely together to deliver a better, more efficient railway for the farepayer and the taxpayer."
A spokesman for ScotRail said the company spent £2m to better prepare for this winter. "That spend – which had not been budgeted for – was in direct response to the worst winter in 100 years. It shows just how committed we are to reducing delays and to ensuring as many services as possible run, no matter the conditions we face."
The company also pointed out it had paid "at least £500,000" in ticket refunds following the 2010/11 extreme weather, which exceeded its requirements under the Passengers' Charter and delays for which it was responsible had fallen by half since the start of the franchise.
A Transport Scotland spokesman said: "The flow of monies to and from First ScotRail is based on the arrangements and benchmarks laid out in its Track Access Agreement with Network Rail, an agreement regulated by the Office of Rail Regulation.
"The intention of the financial component of the performance element of this agreement is to encourage the parties concerned to work to reduce delays and cancellations on the railway network in Scotland for the benefit of passengers."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article