SCOTLAND'S most senior civil servant has come under fire over a £500 million difference in the reported costs of five key transport projects.
Labour's Ken Macintosh challenged Sir Peter Housden, Permanent Secretary to the Scottish Government, on why he produced different costings from public spending watchdog Audit Scotland.
Sir Peter was being questioned on the issue by Holyrood's Public Audit Committee for the first time.
Mr Macintosh said: "Half-a-billion pounds is not being reported and, as far as I can tell, you do not provide that information to the committee in a manner that is accessible."
In a report to the committee, Sir Peter said the capital value of the new Forth crossing; the Aberdeen bypass; improvements to the M8, M73 and M74 motorways; improvements to the Edinburgh to Glasgow rail line; and the new Borders railway was £3.28 billion to £3.43 billion.
But Audit Scotland gave a higher estimate for the five projects of about £3.8 billion.
Sir Peter explained this was "essentially the difference between the contract construction costs of the five projects and the figures used in the Audit Scotland report, which include a variety of other costs" such as the purchase of land necessary for works to go ahead. There was no shortfall in funding, he insisted.
The Government has now "undertaken to develop that standardised approach and to review the format and threshold for public reporting of major projects".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article