WORK on extending a high-speed rail network to Scotland, offering a train journey of less than three hours to London, will start later this year, UK Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin has said.
A study examining the potential of running 250mph trains to the north of England and Scotland will be completed early in 2013, though Scottish Government officials said they were unaware of it.
The announcement follows a torrid week at the Department for Transport, which was forced to abandon the award of a £13 billion contract to run West Coast passenger trains between Scotland and London to First Group last Wednesday following a legal challenge by Virgin Trains.
First, which had £244 million wiped off its share value, is considering whether to sue the UK Government.
A spokesman for the Aberdeen-based company said it was still awaiting a briefing from the DfT on who would take over the West Coast route on December 9, when Virgin's existing contract expires.
The Coalition has endured fierce criticism, including from Conservative backbenchers, over its commitment to building a £33bn route connecting London to Birmingham by 2026 and extending it along separate branch lines to Manchester and Leeds by 2033.
Mr McLoughlin said: "We can't afford not to build it. Our competitors around the world are investing in the best transport, and we must too."
On extending the line north of Manchester and Leeds, he added: "We're launching a study on the way to get fast journeys further north still, with the aim of getting the journey from Scotland to London to under three hours and making sure the North East benefits too, because this will be a scheme for every person in Britain."
A DfT spokesman said the study would look at "capacity and journey times" and involve Government agency Transport Scotland.
However, the agency said officials had no knowledge of the study.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article