South Africa's governing African National Congress has voted overwhelmingly to keep president Jacob Zuma as its head, probably guaranteeing him another term leading the country.
Mr Zuma trounced deputy president Kgalema Motlanthe – his only challenger who ran a largely muted and reluctant campaign – getting 2983 votes to 991.
The ANC voted to install wealthy businessman Cyril Ramaphosa as deputy president, sending Mr Motlanthe out of the top rungs of power after his challenge.
Around 4000 delegates voted in the leadership contest at the ANC's Mangaung conference.
The run-up to the event saw disrupted provincial meetings, threats and shootings of local ANC officials, as corruption allegations trailed from the smallest local government to Mr Zuma at the top.
That had many wondering whether the ANC still remains the party of reconciliation and racial fellowship that Nelson Mandela and others envisioned.
Mr Zuma, 70, was the favourite heading into the conference after winning the nominations in most provincial ANC polls.
He has wide support among Zulus, South Africa's largest ethnic group, as well as from a loyal cadre of government officials.
But many in the public have grown disenchanted with Mr Zuma, who former president Thabo Mbeki fired as deputy president in 2005 after he was implicated in the corruption trial of close friend and financial adviser Schabir Shaik over a 1999 arms deal.
Newspapers have written numerous articles recently about the millions of dollars of government-paid improvements made to Mr Zuma's private homestead.
Mr Zuma has also faced accusations, by the media, of being unable to manage his personal finances and relying on friends and colleagues to bail him out.
Mr Zuma has also faced criticism over his sexual activity and was put on trial on charges of raping a family friend in 2006, but was acquitted.
He and the ANC have also been criticised for strikes in the mining sector, and the handling of violence at the Lonmin platinum mine in Marikana in August.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article