A ballistics expert has told the Oscar Pistorius murder trial that his analysis of the scene where the Olympic athlete shot his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp differs from the reconstruction of the shooting by police investigators.
The study of the sequence and trajectory of bullets that struck Ms Steenkamp through a closed toilet door is at the centre of testimony over her body position and how rapidly Pistorius fired the fatal shots.
Police say Ms Steenkamp, a 29-year-old model and television personality, was cowering with her hands over her head when she was hit in the head.
But Wollie Wolmarans, a private ballistics expert, testified for the defence that he did not believe her left hand was over her head.
The painstaking debate over detail reflects the defence's efforts to show Ms Steenkamp was not arguing with Pistorius when she was shot in the early hours of February 14 last year, as the prosecution contends.
Pistorius, 27, is charged with the premeditated murder for Ms Steenkamp. He says the killing was accidental because he mistook her for an intruder. The athlete held his hands over his ears in court when Mr Wolmarans talked about Ms Steenkamp's wounds.
Pistorius faces 25 years to life in prison if convicted of premeditated murder. His fate will be decided by a judge, as South Africa does not have trial by jury.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article