Accused cinema gunman James Holmes made another brief court appearance a day after he was ordered to face trial, but his lawyers asked for more time to prepare a plea to charges he shot dead 12 people and wounded 58 others.
A Colorado state court judge granted a request to postpone arraignment for the 25-year-old former doctoral student in neuroscience to give his legal team more time to study the evidence and testimony presented by prosecutors at a preliminary hearing this week. The arraignment was set for March 12.
At the conclusion of yesterday's proceedings, a spectator in the section of the Arapahoe County district courtroom reserved for victims and their families shouted: "Rot in hell!"
The judge, William Sylvester, held a short private conference with lawyers in the hallway and reconvened the hearing to address the outburst, admonishing the spectator, Steve Hernandez, whose daughter was killed.
"I can only begin to imagine the emotions that are raging. I'm truly sorry for your loss," the judge said.
Sylvester ruled on Thursday that prosecutors had succeeded in establishing probable cause to believe that Holmes, described by his own lawyers as suffering from a mental illness, committed the crimes alleged against him and ordered that he remain held without bail to stand trial.
The ruling followed three days of wrenching testimony about the shooting, its bloody aftermath and the elaborate preparations that Holmes is accused of making for the attack.
Holmes is charged with multiple counts of first-degree murder and attempted murder stemming from the July 20 rampage at the screening of Batman film The Dark Knight Rises in the Denver suburb of Aurora.
l A teacher and a member of school staff have been hailed heroes for confronting a student who planned to shoot two classmates at a California high school.
The 16-year-old,armed with a shotgun, walked into the school, shot one student and fired at others before a teacher and another staff member talked him into surrendering, officials said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article