FORMER Pope Benedict has branded as "absurd" fresh media speculation that he was forced to quit.
Church law says a pope's resignation is valid only if he takes the decision in full freedom and without pressure from others.
And in one of the few times he has broken his silence since stepping down nearly a year ago, Benedict, 86, said: "There is absolutely no doubt regarding the validity of my resignation from the Petrine ministry."
His comments were made in a letter to the Italian website Vatican Insider.
Benedict, who now has the title Pope Emeritus, said: "The only condition for the validity of my resignation is the complete freedom of my decision. Speculation regarding its validity is simple absurd."
Benedict announced his decision to resign on February 11, 2013, and formally stepped down on February 28, becoming the first pope in 600 years to do so.
Two weeks later, Francis was elected the first non-European pope in 1300 years.
Benedict said at the time he was stepping down because he no longer had the physical and spiritual strength to run the 1.2 billion member Church and his decision had been taken in full freedom.
Earlier this month on the day after the first anniversary of the announcement of the resignation, Italian newspaper Libero ran a long story reviving speculation Benedict may have been forced to resign because of scandals in the Vatican.
In 2012, Benedict's butler was arrested for leaking sensitive documents alleging corruption among Vatican prelates and irregularities in Vatican finances.
Libero also suggested Benedict chose to continue to wear white because he still felt like he was a pope.
Benedict, who lives inside a former convent on the Vatican grounds, was also asked about this and responded: "I continue to wear a white cassock and kept the name Benedict for purely practical reasons. At the moment of my resignation there were no other cloths available. I wear the white cassock in a visibly different way to how the Pope (Francis) wears it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article