BRITAIN is to destroy 150 tonnes of industrial-grade chemicals as part of the international effort to dismantle President Bashar al Assad's illegal weapons stockpile.
The Foreign Office said the chemical "B precursors" will be shipped to a British port with suitable off- loading equipment before transfer to a commercial site for incineration.
A spokesman stressed the chemicals, "used in the pharmaceutical industry", become toxic only when combined with an "A precursor" to make a nerve agent.
"To eliminate this risk, the A and B precursors will be removed from Syria separately," the spokesman said.
"It is important to stress these are chemicals, not chemical weapons. They do not contain explosives. The chemicals will be sealed in industrial containers to international standards and under the supervision of OPCW [Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons] inspectors."
The British contribution is part of an international effort to dispose of Syria's chemical stockpile following the agreement by Mr Assad to give up his weapons in a deal brokered by the United States and Russia.
The Government is providing a Royal Navy warship to help protect the Danish and Norwegian cargo vessels which will ship the entire stockpile out of Syria as they are sailing through international waters.
It is also providing specialist equipment to the United States to assist in the treatment of the most sensitive chemicals before they are finally destroyed.
"The international mission to destroy Syria's chemical weapons programme is essential to ensure that Assad can never again use these horrific weapons to murder his own people," the Foreign Office spokesman said.
Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander said: "It is right that Britain uses its world-class facilities to make this contribution to destroying Syria's chemical stockpile. We welcome that the Government has given assurances it will implement the tightest safeguards."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article