Burma's government and 16 ethnic armed groups have agreed on the wording of a draft nationwide ceasefire agreement aimed at ending decades of civil unrest.
Though it was lauded as a significant step - the opposing sides have tussled over words and rights over natural resources for months - the continued fighting between the army and small rebel groups along the northern frontier highlighted the many challenges ahead.
"I'm really happy that the two sides have finally agreed on a single draft," said President Thein Sein, who briefly attended the signing. "This opens the door for political dialogue and also further peace talks."
Minutes later, representatives from the government and 16 ethnic armed groups, including the Kachin Independence Army, signed the draft accord.
The specifics were not released and it remained unclear when the final ceasefire deal would be signed.
Burma stunned the world by opening politically and economically in 2011 following elections that most rights groups said were neither free nor fair.
Though Mr Thein Sein started steering the country from a half-century of dictatorship toward democracy, early reforms have either stalled or begun regressing.
That has raised the stakes of getting ceasefire deals with all ethnic armies, one of the president's biggest pledges. Many ethnic armies have been fighting since Burma gained independence from the British in 1948, and experts say continued civil unrest is slowing development in one of South East Asia's poorest countries.
The Kachin Independence Army has been one of the most stubborn holdouts, and its agreement to sign was significant.
But fighting that started last month between rebels and the government in the Kokang region of Shan state continues, complicating ongoing talks. Tens of thousands of people have fled across the border to China. The Ta'ang National Liberation Army, also in Shan state, was refusing to sign on as well.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article