Hillary Clinton has dismissed swirling questions about her family foundation as little more than political attacks from Republicans eager to gain an early advantage in the 2016 US presidential contest.
Mrs Clinton, campaigning for the Democratic nomination in the liberal bastion of Keene, New Hampshire, hit back against accusations foreign governments that made donations to the Clintons' charity received preferential treatment from the State Department while she served in Barack Obama's administration.
"We will be subjected to all kinds of distractions and attacks," she said after a round-table event at a wood furniture factory. "I'm ready for that. I know that that comes, unfortunately, with the territory."
She is making her first campaign visit this year to New Hampshire, the first-in-nation primary state beloved by the Clinton family for giving both her faltering 2008 effort and her husband Bill's struggling 1992 presidential campaign a second wind.
She also took issue with economic views expressed by members of her own party, offering a dark assessment of a "stalled out" US recovery, a judgment at odds with President Obama's brighter view of what the nation has achieved on his watch.
Mrs Clinton was asked by reporters about Peter Schweizer's coming book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story Of How And Why Foreign Governments And Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.
The book claims the Clinton family received speaking fees and donations in return for favours to various foreign interests doled out while she was US secretary of state. Senator Rand Paul, a 2016 Republican candidate, said that would make people "question whether she ought to run for president".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article