US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suffered a blood clot in a vein between her brain and skull but is expected to make a full recovery, her doctors said.
Mrs Clinton did not suffer a stroke or neurological damage as a result of the clot, the doctors said, adding "she is in good spirits, engaging with her doctors, her family and her staff".
Mrs Clinton, who has not been seen in public since December 7, was revealed on Sunday evening to be in a New York hospital having treatment for a blood clot that stemmed from a concussion she suffered in mid-December.
The concussion was itself the result of an earlier illness, described by the State Department as a stomach virus she had picked up during a trip to Europe that led to dehydration and a fainting spell after she returned to the US.
Mrs Clinton's doctors, in the statement released by the State Department, said: "In the course of a routine follow-up MRI on Sunday, the scan revealed a right transverse sinus venous thrombosis had formed. This is a clot in the vein that is situated in the space between the brain and the skull behind the right ear.
"To help dissolve this clot, her medical team began treating the secretary with blood thinners. She will be released once the medication dose has been established.
"In all other aspects of her recovery, the secretary is making excellent progress and we are confident she will make a full recovery."
Mrs Clinton's illness may raise questions about her fitness to be president should she make a new run for the White House in 2016. Barack Obama defeated her in the 2008 Democratic primary and then, upon his election as president, took the unusual step of tapping her for the most important post in his Cabinet.
Mrs Clinton earlier this month played down the notion she would run again for the White House in 2016, telling a TV interviewer: "I've said I really don't believe that that's something I will do again."
She is expected to step down when her replacement as secretary of state, Senator John Kerry, is confirmed by the Senate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article