ROME
Italy's highest court will not rule until Friday on whether to uphold the conviction of American Amanda Knox and her Italian ex-boyfriend for the murder of British student Meredith Kercher.
The case, which has inspired books and films, has riveted media attention for eight years and the court's eventual decision could trigger a legal battle over Knox's extradition.
The Court of Cassation began the hearing on Wednesday and had been expected to decide later in the day but closing arguments went slowly and judges rescheduled for Friday morning.
Knox, 27, and Raffaele Sollecito, 30, were convicted for the second time last year for the murder of 21-year-old Kercher, an exchange student from the University of Leeds who was stabbed to death in a house the women shared in Perugia, a university city in central Italy.
A confirmation of the convictions could trigger a complicated battle to try to extradite Knox from the US. Sollecito, whose passport has been withdrawn and who attended the hearing, could be arrested.
The court might, however, overturn the conviction, and then either order yet another trial or effectively acquit the two - though legal experts said that last option was unlikely.
Both Knox and Sollecito have maintained their innocence throughout.
Washington has refused to send military personnel to serve sentences in Italy in the past, but sparing a private citizen from extradition would be an "anomaly", Pier Luigi Petrillo, Professor of Comparative Law at Rome's LUISS university, said.
"If an American citizen has been found guilty of a crime and in particular a serious crime such as murder on Italian soil, there is an obligation by the United States to extradite the American citizen," Mr Petrillo said.
Knox has come to be seen in her home country as the victim of a botched investigation and an unwieldy legal system.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article