Thailand's attorney general has pressed criminal charges against former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra for negligence related to her government's money-losing rice subsidy scheme.
The prosecutors' office submitted 20 boxes of the case's documents to the supreme court's criminal division for politicians.
They accused Ms Yingluck of dereliction in overseeing a rice subsidy scheme that lost billions of pounds and temporarily cost Thailand its crown as the world's top rice exporter.
The move is widely seen as an attempt to cripple the political machine of Ms Yingluck's brother, former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who was ousted in a 2006 coup, and to prevent his allies from returning to power.
It comes a month after Ms Yingluck was impeached on similar grounds by the military-appointed parliament and banned from politics for five years.
The move is likely to prolong conflicts in a divided nation plagued by political turmoil and coups.
Ms Yingluck was ousted from power by a court decision shortly before the military staged a coup last May and seized power from her elected government.
The supreme court will set up a nine-judge panel, which will decide on March 19 whether to accept the case and formally indict Ms Yingluck.
The national anti-corruption commission yesterday recommended the finance ministry sue her for compensation for damage caused by the rice scheme.
It suggested the amount should be at least £11.9 billion.
The rice-buying scheme was a flagship policy that helped Ms Yingluck's Pheu Thai Party win elections in 2011.
But it had accumulated losses of at least £2.89bn since it was introduced in 2011, as the Thai government stockpiled rice to avoid even bigger losses.
Under the scheme, farmers were paid about 50 per cent above what they would get on the world market.
The anti-corruption body alleged Ms Yingluck failed to stop massive losses to state coffers.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article