French Defence Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian has backed the idea of sending a UN peacekeeping force into Mali, saying France would play a role in any plan.
The UN Security Council is to begin discussing the possibility of deploying troops in the stricken West African nation, envoys said of an idea it had previously been uncomfortable with before France's recent intervention.
The French military have taken control of the airport in Kidal, the last town held by al Qaeda-linked rebels, and is planning to hand over to a larger African force, whose task will be to root out insurgents in the mountains.
UN envoys have said sending in a peacekeeping force would offer advantages over an African-led force, as it would be easier to monitor human rights compliance and the UN could choose which national contingents to use.
"This development is extremely positive and I want this to be carried through," Mr Le Drian said, adding France would "obviously play its role".
France has deployed some 4500 troops in a three-week ground and air offensive, aimed at breaking the Islamists' 10-month hold on towns in northern Mali. After taking back Gao and Timbuktu at the weekend, Mr Le Drian said troops were still stuck at the airport in Kidal, where bad weather was delaying them. Experts are warning of the reprisals as displaced Malians return to their liberated towns armed.
Meanwhile Mali's interim president, Dioncounda Traore, said he was open to dialogue with autonomy-seeking Tuareg MNLA rebels if they drop any claim for independence.
But he refused to negotiate with al Qaeda-linked Islamist insurgents.
The Tuaregs started a rebellion in northern Mali last year that was hijacked by Islamist radicals who seized the northern two-thirds of the nation.
French and Malian forces have broken the Islamist alliance's grip over the cities of northern Mali.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article