Australia'S prime minister Julia Gillard has set national elections for September 14, stunning voters with eight months' notice in a move designed to end uncertainty surrounding her struggling minority government.
The date means her administration will serve a full three-year term, although analysts said the early notice meant she had lost her ability to surprise opposition leader Tony Abbott with a snap poll.
Opinion polls put Mr Abbott's Liberal-National party ahead of Ms Gillard's Labour party and she would be swept from office, losing up to 18 seats, if an election were held now. The government could concede power if it loses one seat.
The election will decide whether Australia keeps its controversial carbon tax, and a 30% tax on coal and iron ore mining profits, which Mr Abbott promised to scrap it if he wins power.
But apart from these two policies, the government and opposition differ little on domestic issues, and both support greater involvement with China, the country's biggest trade partner, and close defence ties with the United States.
Mr Abbott said he was ready to fight the election, adding it would be decided on Ms Gillard's credibility.
"This election will be about trust," he said, hinting he will focus on a broken promise not to introduce a carbon tax and failure to deliver a budget surplus.
Mr Abbott has eroded government support through his constant negative attacks, but has yet to make any detailed policy announcements.
He will make his first major speech of 2013 today.
Ms Gillard governs with support from a group of independents and the Greens, who all support the September 14 election.
That means she has locked in majority support until the election, although a sudden by-election could still change the balance if a lawmaker dies.
Under Australian laws, governments serve for up to three years and the PM decides the election date.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article