The Hong Kong government has published a long-awaited electoral blueprint for selecting the city's next leader, a plan enshrining China's desire for a tightly controlled poll that has angered activists and stoked talk of fresh protests.
The government proposal follows huge pro-democracy demonstrations last year in one of the boldest populist challenges to Beijing's Communist Party rule since the former British colony returned to Chinese control in 1997.
Analysts said the conservative blueprint, which lawmakers will vote on early in summer, could again stir political tensions in the financial hub after a lull of several months.
More than 100 democracy protesters denounced the blueprint outside the legislature, rejecting calls by Hong Kong's leader Leung Chun-ying to accept the package as the best possible model for universal suffrage from Beijing.
"As of now, we see no room for any compromise," Mr Leung said. "To initiate any political reform process is not easy. If this proposal is vetoed, it could be several years before the next opportunity."
Tens of thousands of pro-democracy demonstrators blocked major roads in four key districts in Hong Kong last year, demanding Beijing grant a truly democratic vote and open nominations for Hong Kong's next chief executive in 2017.
Their pleas were ignored, however, and police cleared away the last of the so-called "Umbrella Revolution" encampments in mid-December.
The blueprint for the proposal that the public vote on two or three candidates pre-selected by a 1,200-member pro-Beijing nominating committee was first outlined by China's parliament, the National People's Congress (NPC), last August.
The Hong Kong government stood by that blueprint, saying it was disregarding suggestions that did not conform to the city's mini-constitution and the NPC decision.
Democratic lawmakers, wearing black jerseys with yellow crosses to symbolise their pledge to oppose any plan smacking of "fake universal suffrage", walked out of the legislative chamber in protest.
Most of the city's 27 opposition legislators, who hold a one-third veto bloc in the 70-person chamber, said they would vote against the package.
Joshua Wong, one of the leaders of the pro-democracy movement, said if the government did manage to get the framework passed it could unleash a fresh wave of protests.
He added: "It is highly likely this will trigger protests, whether occupying roads or civil disobedience."
Hong Kong Chief Secretary Carrie Lam said she was not worried, adding: "We believe that after announcing the specific proposals there will be political parties and organisations and groups which may resort to more aggressive protests, but we don't think that such a large-scale occupation will happen again".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article