Islamic State (IS) says it has destroyed six archaeological pieces from the historic Syrian town of Palmyra after they were confiscated from a smuggler.
An IS statement said the six busts were found when the smuggler was stopped at a checkpoint.
The issue was referred to an Islamic court which ordered they be destroyed and the man be whipped.
Photographs released by the group showed IS fighters destroying the busts with large hammers.
The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said it was unclear if the busts were authentic or if the militants destroyed fake busts as a cover for the IS group's own antiquities smuggling.
In March, IS members in Iraq razed 3,000-year-old Nimrod and bulldozed 2,000-year-old Hatra - both Unesco world heritage sites.
Satellite photos and anecdotal evidence confirm widespread plundering of archaeological sites in areas under IS control.
The militants captured the historic Syrian town of Palmyra in May from government forces. Many fear that the group will damage the town's archaeological sites as they did in neighbouring Iraq earlier this year.
Palmyra's Unesco world heritage site is famous for its 2,000-year-old Roman colonnades, other ruins and priceless artefacts. Before Syria's conflict began in 2011, tens of thousands of tourists visited the remote desert outpost, a cherished landmark referred to by Syrians as the Bride of the Desert.
The Sunni extremists, who have imposed a violent interpretation of shariah law in the territories they control in Syria and Iraq, believe ancient relics promote idolatry.
IS militants also recently destroyed a lion statue dating back to the 2nd century in Palmyra, said Maamoun Abdulkarim, the head of the Syrian government's Antiquities and Museums Department.
He said the statue, discovered in 1977, had stood at the gate of the town's museum, and had been placed inside a metal box to protect it from damage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article