Canada's most conservative province has elected a left-of-centre government, ending a 44-year-old conservative party dynasty.
Voters in the western oil-rich province of Alberta, sometimes called the Texas of the North, chose a New Democratic Party government in yesterday's election.
Few had predicted such a result just 28 days ago when the election was called by Progressive Conservative Alberta premier Jim Prentice, a former top cabinet minister in prime minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government.
"Pigs do fly," CTV television host Don Martin tweeted.
After the votes were tallied, Mr Prentice announced that he was finished with public life and was stepping down as the leader of the Progressive Conservatives in the province. He will also vacate the seat he won in the election.
"I think we might have made a little bit of history tonight," incoming New Democratic premier Rachel Notely said. "Change has finally come to Alberta."
Nelson Wiseman, a University of Toronto political science professor, said the result did not mean Mr Harper would not do well in his home province in October's national election.
Mr Wiseman said it showed the NDP was not as radical as it once was and that campaigns mattered. He said gaffes by Mr Prentice and voter fatigue with Alberta's Progressive Conservatives contributed.
"The main message is a social democratic party isn't all that radical any more. Americans are freaked out by socialism but when Tony Blair was in power in the UK they related to him as a strong ally," Mr Wiseman said.
Ms Notely has vowed to raise corporate tax rates and conduct a review of the province's royalty structure to ensure that Albertans are getting a fair return for their oil and gas resources.
Alberta has the world's third largest oil reserves, with 170 billion barrels of proven reserves.
Mr Prentice was previously one of Mr Harper's most trusted cabinet ministers and was tipped to replace him one day.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article