Libya's newly elected national assembly has picked former opposition leader Mohammed Magarief as its president.
Mr Magarief, seen as a moderate Islamist, will head the 200-member congress, which will name a prime minister, pass laws and steer the North African country to full parliamentary elections after a new constitution is drafted next year.
Mr Magarief, leader of the National Front party, is effectively acting head of state. An economist and former Libyan ambassador to India who had been exiled since the 1980s,
Mr Magarief was a leader of Libya's oldest opposition movement – the National Front for the Salvation of Libya – which made several attempts to end Muammar Gaddafi's rule.
The 72-year-old's National Front Party is an offshoot of the old opposition movement and won three seats in the July 7 poll – Libya's first free vote in a generation.
"I am very, very happy. This is a big responsibility," he said after the late night vote on Thursday.
Mr Magarief won 113 votes versus independent Ali Zidan on 85 votes. Voting went to a second round after there was no outright majority in the first.
"This is democracy. This is what we have dreamt of," said Mr Zidan, congratulating Mr Magarief.
The assembly also voted for Giuma Attaiga, a lawyer from the port city of Misrata, as a deputy to Mr Magarief, who had been seen as a lead
"He is a political personality and everybody knows him," Othman Sassi, a former official of the National Transitional Council, said of Mr Magarief. "He has very good experience to lead congress and the Libyan democratic state."
Mr Magarief is from Libya's second biggest city, Benghazi, the cradle of last year's revolt. This is likely to placate fears that the region would be marginalised by a centralised authority in the capital Tripoli.
The national assembly took over on Wednesday from the National Transitional Council, the political arm of the opposition that toppled Gaddafi a year ago, which is now dissolved.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article