Mali's prime minister was forced to resign yesterday by the soldiers who staged a coup in March, complicating international efforts to help push Islamists from the north of the country.
Once a beacon of democracy in West Africa, Mali has been mired in crisis since ethnic Tuareg rebels and al Qaeda-linked Islamist fighters seized the northern two-thirds of the arid nation in the wake of the coup.
Although the soldiers handed over to a civilian president and prime minister under international pressure, they have remained powerful.
Cheick Modibo Diarra resigned as prime minister hours after he was arrested trying to leave the country for former colonial power France, and was brought to the ex-junta's headquarters at a barracks in Kati, just outside Bamako.
"I, Cheick Modibo Diarra, hereby resign with my entire government," a nervous-looking Diarra said in a short statement broadcast on state television.
Mr Diarra is a former Nasa scientist and Microsoft chief for Africa who was made prime minister in April.
Fearing Mali has become a safe haven for terrorism and organised crime, West African leaders have signed off on a plan to send 3300 soldiers there to revamp Mali's army and then support operations to retake the north.
Mr Diarra's forced resignation was a clear indication that those behind the coup still maintained considerable control, a fact that could discourage international partners from backing the plan until civilian rule is strengthened.
France called for a new government to be formed quickly after the resignation.
"These developments underline the need for the rapid deployment of an African stabilisation force," French Foreign Ministry spokesman Philippe Lalliot said.
A spokesman for the former junta said yesterday's events did not amount to a new coup and that interim civilian president Diouncounda Traore remained in place.
There was no immediate reaction from the president.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article