Syrian rebels bombed a military complex in Damascus yesterday, igniting a fire that gutted the army command headquarters.
The Free Syrian Army, the main force fighting to overthrow President Bashar al Assad, claimed responsibility for the attack, which it said left dozens dead.
But an armed forces statement said military leaders were unhurt, although four security guards were wounded in the blasts.
It was the biggest attack since July 18, when a blast killed several security officials, including Mr Assad's brother-in-law, the defence and interior ministers.
That attack paved the way for a rebel advance into the capital, although they have since been pushed back to the outskirts.
Internet footage of yesterday's fire at the General Staff Command Building in Umayad Square showed flames engulfing its upper floors, indicating explosives were planted inside.
The blast also left a deep crater in the ground, apparently where the explosive-laden car blew up.
"All our colleagues in the military leadership, the army staff command and the Defence Ministry are unhurt," Information Minister Omran Zoabi said.
Security forces were chasing "armed terrorists" – a term the authorities use to refer to insurgents waging war to oust Assad.
"It's a terrorist act, close to an important site, that's true. But they failed to achieve their goal," he said.
Activist Sami al Shami said the main explosions were caused by a suicide car bomb and second car loaded with explosives on the perimeter of the complex.
"The fighters went inside and clashed with security, while some men started to torch the building," he said.
"There must be several security forces dead, there's no way the rebels could have made it in that far without killing any security forces," he said.
A correspondent for Iran's English-language Press TV was shot dead by a rebel sniper, and its Damascus bureau chief was wounded while they covered Wednesday's explosions, Press TV said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article