MASS protests called by Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood mostly failed to materialise as the movement reeled from a bloody army crackdown on followers of ousted President Mohamed Mursi.
Troops and police took relatively low-key security measures before the Friday of Martyrs processions that were to have begun from 28 mosques in the capital after weekly prayers.
But midday prayers were cancelled at some mosques and there were few signs of major demonstrations unfolding in Cairo.
Egypt has endured the bloodiest civil unrest in its modern history since August 14, when police destroyed protest camps set up by Mr Mursi's supporters in Cairo to demand his reinstatement.
The violence has alarmed Egypt's Western allies but US President Barack Obama acknowledged that even a decision to cut off US aid to Cairo might not influence its military rulers. He said the US was re-evaluating its ties with Egypt, adding: "There's no doubt we can't return to business as usual, given what's happened."
The US has nurtured an alliance with Egypt since it signed a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Military cooperation includes privileged US access to the Suez Canal.
The Brotherhood, hounded by Egypt's new army-backed rulers, had called for demonstrations across the country against the crackdown, testing the resilience of its battered support base.
Security forces kept a watchful eye but did not flood the streets, even near Cairo's central Fateh mosque where gun battles killed scores of people last Friday and Saturday.
Hosni Mubarak, the ex-military former president toppled in 2011, was freed from jail on Thursday in a symbolic victory for the army, while Mr Mursi remains behind bars.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article