THE Afghan Government has failed to secure direct talks with the Taliban and no significant progress is expected before 2014, when most Nato combat troops withdraw, a senior Afghan official closely involved with reconciliation efforts has said.
A political settlement between the Afghan government and insurgents is widely seen as the best way of delivering stability to the country before most Nato combat troops pull out at the end of 2014.
Afghan officials were also hoping to make progress in reconciliation efforts before presidential elections in April 2014 to decrease the chances of prolonged instability in a nation that has suffered through decades of war.
"There have been contacts here and there but no face-to-face talks have taken place," the Afghan official said of the bid to engage the Taliban.
"There have been none in Afghanistan or other countries."
There has also been scant progress on other fronts. The Taliban said in March they were suspending nascent peace talks with the United States held in Qatar, blaming "erratic and vague" US statements. The Afghan official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, suggested the contacts that had been made with the Taliban had been limited.
"The contacts have taken place mostly at the provincial level.
"For instance, an official may meet Taliban commanders and urge them not to attack schools," he said.
Regional power Pakistan, which has a long history of ties to Afghan insurgent groups, was in a strong position to help stabilise Afghanistan, but needed to do more, said the official.
Islamabad denies claims it uses Afghan insurgent groups as proxies in Afghanistan and has pledged to do all it can to end the fighting.
The official added: "In practice, they need to facilitate faster."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article