President Barack Obama, wrapping up the first leg of an African tour, said Washington had a "moral imperative" to help the world's poorest continent feed itself.
White House officials hope Mr Obama's three-nation tour of Africa – his first substantial visit to the continent – will compensate for what some view as years of neglect by America's first black president.
Before departing Senegal, Mr Obama met farmers and entrepreneurs to discuss new technologies that will raise agricultural output.The President said his administration was making food security a top priority of its development agenda.
He added: "This is a moral imperative. I believe Africa is rising and wants to partner with us: not be dependent but be self sufficient. Far too many Africans endure the daily injustice of poverty and chronic hunger."
Mr Obama played down expectations of a meeting with ailing Nelson Mandela.
He said: "The last thing I want to do is to be in any way obtrusive at a time when the family is concerned with Nelson Mandela's condition."
Mr Obama is scheduled to visit Robben Island, where Mr Mandela spent years in prison under South Africa's former white minority regime, later during his trip and the last stop will be Tanzania.
The President's only previous visit to the continent was a one-day stopover in Ghana.
Food security, along with anti-corruption measures and trade opportunities for US companies, are topics the White House wants to highlight on Mr Obama's eight-day tour.
While acknowledging Mr Obama has not spent as much time in Africa as people hoped, the administration is eager to highlight what it has done, in part to end unflattering comparisons to accomplishments of predecessors George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.
Food security and public aid are two of the issues the Obama team believes are success stories. USAID head Raj Shah told reporters Africa had seen a steady increase in resources under Mr Obama's administration despite a tough budget environment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article