Syrian rebels killed at least 80 army soldiers at the weekend in a surge of attacks that followed their threat to resume fighting if President Bashar al Assad failed to observe a UN-backed ceasefire, an opposition watchdog said
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) said doctors had confirmed the deaths of 80 soldiers.
Insurgents told the group they had killed more than 100 soldiers and destroyed tanks in clashes across Syria, including Damascus and the Idlib province in the north-west.
Some commanders in the rebel Free Syrian Army had announced they would be "free of any commitment" to international envoy Kofi Annan's peace plan if Mr Assad did not end violence by Friday.
The May 25 massacre of at least 108 people, nearly half of them children, in the Houla area of Homs province, dealt a possibly fatal blow to Mr Annan's proposed ceasefire, which was supposed to take effect on April 12.
Rami Abdelrahman, the head of the SOHR, said many army checkpoints were destroyed in heavy clashes overnight in Idlib province, where many rebels operate.
He said: "A minimum of four to six in the village of Ariha were attacked and destroyed."
The 15-month-old uprising against Mr Assad's 11-year rule began with peaceful protests, but Syria is now slipping into civil war as rebels fight back against a violent government crackdown.
The UN said Mr Assad's forces have killed more than 9000 people since March, 2011. Syria blames the violence on armed "terrorists" it says have killed more than 2600 soldiers and other members of the security forces.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article