OSCAR Pistorius's lawyers have finished their defence of the Olympic and Paralympic track star, bringing the dramatic murder trial of one of the world's best-known athletes closer to conclusion.
Judge Thokozile Masipa adjourned the court until August 7 to allow the legal teams to prepare closing arguments, due to take a day each. She will then begin her deliberations, extending a trial that has already dragged on over four months.
The case has captivated global audiences and had round-the-clock coverage in Pistorius's native South Africa, making it arguably the most-watched celebrity murder trial since US athlete OJ Simpson was cleared of murdering his wife in 1995.
Pistorius, who had his lower legs amputated as a baby, faces life in prison if he is found guilty of murdering his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp, whom he shot dead at his luxury Pretoria home on Valentine's Day last year.
The 27-year-old athlete, known as Blade Runner because of the carbon-fibre prosthetic legs he uses, says he killed Ms Steenkamp after mistaking her for an intruder hiding in the toilet next to his bedroom.
The state alleges he fired four rounds from a 9mm pistol in a fit of rage after an argument, killing the 29-year-old law graduate and model as she cowered behind the locked toilet door.
The killing has shattered the image of Pistorius as an embodiment of triumph over adversity for both his Paralympic victories and competition against able-bodied athletes at the 2012 London Olympics.
The track star broke down frequently during the trial, often sobbing and vomiting into a bucket.
The emotional displays were in marked contrast to his composed and confident demeanour as he re-enacted the shooting in a leaked video aired on Australian television on Sunday.
After the broadcast of the film, which Pistorius's lawyers said was for trial preparation only and had been "obtained illegally" by Australia's Channel 7, Judge Masipa banned any publication of the closing arguments before they are read in court.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article