MONTHS before he killed his girlfriend, Oscar Pistorius described how he drew his gun and went into "combat mode" after hearing a possible intruder at his home, a South African firearms expert has told the athlete's murder trial.
But the noise turned out to be a washing machine, the High Court in Pretoria heard.
Sean Rens, manager of the International Firearm Training Academy in Walkerville, said he had many conversations about firearms with Pistorius, who is accused of murdering his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on February 14 last year.
He said the double- amputee runner had "a great love and enthusiasm" for guns.
Mr Rens said he met Pistorius in 2012 and trained at a gun range with him. In one conversation, Pistorius described how he was startled by a noise at home and decided to clear the house by drawing his gun and checking rooms, according to Mr Rens.
"He went into what we call 'code red' or combat mode," Mr Rens said. "When he came to the source of the noise, it was the laundry or something."
Pistorius had tweeted about the incident in November 2012: "Nothing like getting home to hear the washing machine on and thinking it's an intruder to go into full combat recon mode into the pantry!"
The athlete claims he killed Ms Steenkamp, 29, by accident before dawn on Valentine's Day last year, shooting her through a closed toilet door after mistaking her for an intruder. Prosecutors say he killed her after an argument.
Mr Rens said Pistorius was aware of South African firearms and self-defence laws that say you cannot shoot at an intruder unless your life is in danger.
In a gun licence test passed by the athlete, one of the questions asked whether a homeowner was allowed to shoot burglars on the other side of a security gate. Pistorius answered "No", Mr Rens told the court.
Ms Steenkamp's mother June was in court for a second time yesterday after attending the first day on March 3. The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article