The murder trial of Olympic and Paralympic sprinter Oscar Pistorius has been adjourned until May 5 after the state wrapped up its cross-examination of a forensic expert brought by the defence.
Judge Thokozile Masipa granted the state's request for a postponement to avoid conflicts with other cases.
Prosecutor Gerrie Nel - nicknamed "The Pitbull" for his aggressive style - tore into defence witness Roger Dixon over three days, questioning his credibility and expertise.
Pistorius, 27, is on trial for the murder of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp, whom he shot dead with four rounds from a 9mm pistol on Valentine's Day last year. The athlete insists he killed the 29-year-old law graduate and model after mistaking her for an intruder.
Mr Dixon, a forensic geologist and former police officer, testified that Ms Steenkamp was standing at an angle to the door with her arm out in front of her, suggesting she was reaching for the handle, when Pistorius shot her dead.
The testimony challenged the version of the state, which has sought to portray Pistorius as a gun-obsessed hot-head who murdered Ms Steenkamp after an argument.
Mr Nel heaped scorn on Dixon's expertise, prompting Judge Masipa to tell the advocate to restrain himself.
When the geologist said on Wednesday that he tested the sound of a cricket bat hitting a wooden door to see if it could be confused with the sound of a gun shot, Mr Nel asked: "Do you need to be an expert to do that? What expert skills did you use, wielding a bat?"
At another point, Mr Dixon confessed to being a "layman" with no professional experience in blood spatter analysis, forensic pathology or ballistics.
After asking Mr Dixon for another of his findings, Mr Nel added: "I use the word 'finding' loosely".
The globally high-profile trial is due to resume two days before South Africa goes to the polls for a national election.
Defence advocate Barry Roux is expected to call his next witness once the trial resumes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article