A BRITISH businessman was poisoned after he threatened to expose a plan by a Chinese leader's wife to move money abroad, two sources with knowledge of the police investigation have claimed.
It was the first time a motive has been revealed for Neil Heywood's murder last November, a death that ended Chinese politician Bo Xilai's hopes of emerging as a top central leader and threw off balance the Communist Party's looming leadership succession.
Mr Bo's wife Gu Kailai asked Mr Heywood to move a large sum of money abroad, and she became outraged when he demanded a larger cut than expected, the sources claimed.
She accused him of being greedy and hatched a plan to kill him after he said he could expose her dealings, one of the sources said. Both sources say they have spoken to investigators in Chongqing, the south-western Chinese city where Mr Heywood was killed and where Mr Bo had cast himself as a crime-fighting Communist Party leader.
Prime Minister David Cameron is likely to discuss the murder with visiting Chinese official Li Changchun today. "It's likely to come up," his spokeswoman said.
Gu is in police custody on suspicion of committing or arranging Mr Heywood's murder, though no details of the motive or the crime itself have been publicly released, other than a general comment from state media that he was killed after a financial dispute.
They said Heywood was killed after he threatened to expose what she was doing.
The sources, who have have close ties to Chinese police, said officers suspect the 41-year-old was poisoned by a drink. They said Gu and Mr Heywood, who had lived in China since the early 1990s, shared a close relationship but were not romantically involved.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article