President Barack Obama is within reach of the 270 electoral votes needed to win a second term as Republican challenger Mitt Romney's path to victory is narrowing, five weeks from US election day.
To overtake Mr Obama, Mr Romney would need to quickly gain the upper hand in nearly all of the nine states where the two are competing the hardest.
Polls show the President with a steady lead in many of them as Mr Romney looks to shift the dynamics of the race, starting with their first debate tomorrow night in Denver, Colorado.
Mr Obama headed to Las Vegas on Sunday for a rally and planned to stay in Nevada, to prepare for the debate. Mr Romney remained in Boston, Massachusetts, going through preparations of his own.
Mr Romney's running mate, Paul Ryan, said: "In these kinds of races people focus near the end, and that's what's happening now."
Prominent Romney supporter, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, said he expected Mr Romney's debate performance in Denver to shake up the campaign after a "tough couple of weeks".
He predicted Mr Romney would do "extraordinarily well" and that come Thursday morning, "this whole race is going to be turned upside down".
However, top Obama adviser David Plouffe said: "They expect to come out of this with the race fundamentally changed. Now, what does that mean?
"If it's going to fundamentally change, that means in seven or 10 days from now you'll see states like Ohio tied, the state of Iowa tied because that's what really matters here. So they have set the bar quite high."
One analysis shows Mr Obama would win at least 271 electoral votes today, with likely victories in Ohio and Iowa along with 19 other states and the District of Columbia. Mr Romney would win 23 states for a total of 206. A candidate must have at least 270 votes to win.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article