TWO members of Russian punk protest band Pussy Riot have been freed from prison, deriding President Vladimir Putin's amnesty that led to their early release as a propaganda stunt and promising to fight for human rights.
Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 24, shouted "Russia without Putin" following her release from a Siberian prison, hours after band mate Maria Alyokhina, 25, was freed from jail in Nizhny Novgorod.
They walked free days after former oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky was released under a pardon from Mr Putin after more than 10 years in jail, a move widely seen as intended to improve Russia's image before it hosts the Winter Olympics in February.
Tolokonnikova told reporters outside prison in Krasnoyarsk: "The border between being free and not free is very thin in Russia, a totalitarian state."
She and Alyokhina were sentenced to two years in prison for a profanity-laced protest against Mr Putin in a Russian Orthodox church in 2012 after a trial Kremlin critics said was part of a clampdown on dissent in his third presidential term.
The case caused an outcry in the West but there was much less sympathy for the women at home than abroad.
They had been due for release in early March. Mr Putin, who denies jailing people for political reasons, has said the amnesty would show that the Russian state is humane.
However, the measure will not benefit opposition leader Alexei Navalny, a vocal Putin foe who will be kept out of elections for years by a conviction and five-year suspended sentence on a theft charge he says was Kremlin revenge for his activism.
After her release, Alyokhina said the amnesty was far too narrow and aimed at deflecting criticism over human rights before the Olympics in Sochi in February.
She said: "I do not think it is a humanitarian act, I think it is a PR stunt. My attitude to the president has not changed."
Tolokonnikova, who staged a hunger strike earlier this year and drew attention to stark conditions and long hours of mandatory labour in the jail where she was previously held, said she would fight for prisoners' rights.
"Everything is just starting, so fasten your seat belts," she said, suggesting Pussy Riot - jailed for a "punk prayer" in the main cathedral of Russia's dominant faith - would continue to use attention-grabbing protests to make their point.
"I think we will unite our efforts in our human rights activity ... the methods which we will use will remain the same," Alyokhina said in Nizhny Novgorod. "We will try to sing our the song to the end."
Alyokhina said she would have rejected the amnesty if that been a option. She said she wants to focus on human rights including the rights of prisoners.
"I'm not afraid of anything any more - believe me," she said.
In addition to the amnesty, Putin unexpectedly pardoned Khodorkovsky, the former Yukos oil company chief who had been in jail since his arrest in 2003 and conviction in two trials that Kremlin critics said were punishment for challenging Mr Putin.
Khodorkovsky, who was freed on Friday and flown to Germany, said Mr Putin is seeking to improve his image while also showing that he is confident in his grip on power after weathering large opposition protests and winning a third term last year.
Mr Putin wants to send "a signal to society and the world that he feels secure and is not afraid", Mr Khodorkovsky said.
The amnesty is also expected to enable 30 people arrested after a Greenpeace protest against Arctic oil drilling to avoid trial on hooliganism charges, removing another irritant in ties with the West. They faced up to seven years in prison jail if convicted.
Mr Putin said the amnesty was not drafted with the Greenpeace activists or Pussy Riot in mind. Rights activists have estimated the amnesty will free fewer than 1500 of the 564,000 convicts in Russian prisons.
A third Pussy Riot member, Yekaterina Samutsevich, was freed last year when a judge suspended her sentence on appeal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article