Estonia's ruling Reform Party has emerged as the overall winner in the Baltic country's general election dominated by economic issues and security concerns over Russia's actions in Ukraine.
Polls had predicted a close race between the governing centre-right coalition and the opposition Centre Party, favoured by ethnic Russians. With all votes counted, prime minister Taavi Roivas declared victory.
Mr Roivas' pro-Western, liberal party won 28 per cent of the votes to take 30 seats, three seats less than in the previous election, but five more than the main opposition centrists.
The ruling coalition now holds 45 seats in the 101-seat parliament, down from 52 after the previous election in 2011, meaning reforms in the government composition are expected, although mainstream policies likely will remain the same.
Even though Estonia is a Nato member, many are worried that Moscow will try to increase its influence in the former Soviet republic, where one-fourth of its 1.3 million residents are ethnic Russians.
All main political parties strongly support defence spending and a continuation of the Nato presence in Estonia, which together with neighbours Latvia and Lithuania was occupied by the Soviet Union for nearly 50 years.
The main electoral differences focused on economic questions, including tax reforms. Estonia has continued to show strong growth even as many of its European partners are struggling.
All wage earners pay a flat 20 per cent income tax, which opposition centrists want to change to a progressive tax system - a move supported by the minority government partner, the Social Democrats.
The Reform Party is opposed to abolishing the current tax system, focusing instead on job creation to improve the economy of Estonia, a member of the eurozone since 2011.
Preliminary results showed a 63.7 per cent turnout in the electorate of almost one million, up from 63.5 per cent in 2011.
Some 176,000 votes were cast electronically, setting a record in the country, which pioneered online voting in 2005.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article