Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrovhas given "positive indications" on proposals for a daily two-hour halt in fighting in Syria to allow for life-saving aid operations.
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) president Jakob Kellenberger held a 90-minute meeting with Mr Lavrov in Moscow yesterday. He asked Russia to help persuade Damascus to allow more access for humanitarian aid to civilians trapped in areas under fire from President Bashar al Assad's forces.
"It was a positive meeting," ICRC spokesman Hicham Hassan said. "The ICRC received positive indications of support on its operational priorities and its initiative of a two-hour cessation of fighting on a daily basis."
The independent agency hoped to see "concrete results" on the ground in Syria in the coming days or weeks. "The meeting was also focused on the importance today of neutral and independent humanitarian action in Syria," Mr Hassan added.
Russia is one of Mr Assad's few remaining allies and is seen as retaining some leverage on the Damascus Government.
On February 21, the ICRC, the only international agency to deploy aid workers in Syria, proposed a daily humanitarian ceasefire of two hours to allow time to evacuate the wounded safely and deliver food, medicines and other vital supplies.
Meanwhile, rebels fought security forces in Damascus yesterday in the most violent gunbattles the Syrian capital has seen since the start of the year-long uprising against Mr Assad, opposition activists said.
The United Nations says more than 8000 people have been killed and 230,000 forced to flee their home, mostly uprooted within Syria but including at least 30,000 who have moved abroad.
A joint team of experts from the UN and Organisation for Islamic Co-operation, led by the Syrian Government, have started a mission to assess humanitarian needs across Syria.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article