IRAN has said it is prepared to make an offer to major powers in talks on its nuclear programme.
The move came after the US proposed limited sanctions relief in return for a halt to the most controversial work.
The first meeting in eight months between Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany took place yesterday in a bid to resolve a dispute that threatens to trigger another war in the Middle East.
Iran has used the last eight months to expand activity the West suspects is aimed at enabling it to build a nuclear bomb, something Israel has suggested it will prevent by force if diplomacy fails.
The negotiations in the Kazakhstan city of Almaty were expected to run through yesterday and today.
However, with the Islamic Republic's political elite preoccupied with worsening infighting before a presidential election in June, few believe the meeting will yield a quick breakthrough.
"It is clear nobody expects to come from Almaty with a fully done deal," a spokesman for the European Union's foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who oversees contacts with Iran on behalf of world powers, said shortly after talks started.
A US official said the powers' updated offer to Iran would take into account its recent nuclear advances, but also take "some steps in the sanctions arena".
This would address some of Iran's concerns but not meet its demand that all sanctions be lifted, the official said.
In Almaty, a source close to the Iranian negotiating team said Iran would put up a counterproposal.
The source said: "Depending on what proposal we receive, we will present our own proposal of the same weight. The continuation of talks depends on how this exchange of proposals goes forward."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article