SAUDI Arabia has said people handling camels should wear masks and gloves to prevent spreading Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), issuing such a warning for the first time as cases of the potentially fatal virus neared 500 in the kingdom.
Health experts say camels are the most likely animal source of infection for the disease, which the Saudi health ministry on Saturday said that seven more people had caught.
First reported two years ago in Saudi Arabia, MERS is a coronavirus like SARS, which originated in animals and killed about 800 people worldwide after first appearing in China in 2002. There is no vaccine against it or anti-viral treatment for it.
More than one-quarter of the 480 diagnosed with MERS in Saudi Arabia have died, while cases have been reported in other Middle Eastern countries, in Europe and in the United States, which had its first confirmed case last month.
The link between human cases and camels is the subject of extensive study among scientists abroad. But it has been relatively absent from much of the official domestic debate.
In a statement, the Agriculture Ministry advised people not to come into contact with camels unless necessary and to wash their hands before and after if they did, as well as wearing face masks.
It also advised only eating cooked camel meat and to boil camel milk before consuming it.
Public disquiet in Saudi Arabia has grown amid rumours on social media about a lack of transparency from officials about the spread of the disease.
The recent upsurge in reported cases is also of wider concern because of the influx of visitors expected in July during the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan and during the annual Haj pilgrimage in October.
The World Health Organisation said outbreaks of MERS in the city's two main hospitals were partly due to breaches in its recommended infection prevention and control measures.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article